spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

Apparel supply chains hit by perfect storm as costs rise on multiple fronts

Global apparel supply chains are under pressure as prices of fibres and other textile materials rise, energy costs soar and costs of freight escalate, according to “Talking strategy: apparel supply chains hit by perfect storm as costs rise on multiple fronts”, a 6-page report from the global business information company Textiles Intelligence.

The global cotton price—as measured by the Cotlook A Index—almost doubled between April 2020 and December 2021, from 64 US cents/lb to 120 US cents/lb.

Finished goods have been taking longer to reach their destinations as shortages of containers and outbreaks of COVID-19 have halted operations and caused delays at ports. In fact, in many destination ports, the average median times spent by containers in depots—referred to as “dwell times”—reached near-record levels in 2021 as a result of severe congestion.

To add to the apparel industry’s woes, companies importing apparel and other textile products into the US market which contain materials sourced from Xinjiang province in China face a new hurdle as a result of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA).

Under the UFLPA, companies which want to continue importing goods made in Xinjiang must provide “clear and convincing evidence” that the goods in question were not manufactured with forced labour. This places the onus on companies rather than customs officials.

However, global apparel supply chains are notoriously complex and it is often impossible to trace the origins of materials used in the manufacture of a garment. This will make it immensely difficult for companies to guarantee with confidence that the products they are supplying do not contain materials sourced from Xinjiang province in one form or another.

To ensure that they comply with the UFLPA, apparel brands are likely to play safe and source from locations which they can be confident do not use materials made in Xinjiang province. This would limit significantly the amount of cotton available for their products because Xinjiang province accounts for around 90% of the cotton produced in China and for 20% of the cotton produced worldwide.

In this scenario, the amount of cotton available to apparel brands could be reduced by 20% or more and, as a result, it is likely that cotton prices would rise. Ultimately, such a rise could lead to significantly higher apparel prices in retail stores.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

Related News

Jeanologia to Showcase Potential of its Sustainable Atmos Process for Waterless Garment Finishing and Aging.

Jeanologia brings the revolution of waterless stone wash to...

Tunicotex Group Selects FastReactPlan to Transform Production Planning and Target Post-Pandemic Growth

As a critical component of its digitization strategy, Tunicotex...

Smartex Announces 2024 Modern Textile Factory Committee with focus on “Building the Supply Chain Data Highway”

In 2023, Smartex published the first-ever Modern Textile Factory...

Textile Sorting Industry in Europe Faces Crisis, Urgent EU Action Required

Across Europe, the vital industry responsible for sorting discarded...

Successful Collaboration: Groz-Beckert and Santoni Develop Innovative INNOTAS Knitting System

In recent years, Italian circular knitting machine manufacturer Santoni...

Üniteks Adopts Coats Digital’s GSDCost Solution

One of Türkiye’s Leading Ready-Made Clothing Manufacturers, Üniteks, Adopts...

Morocco Garment Industry Balances Higher Wages and Global Competitiveness

The textile landscape in Morocco stands at a critical...

Coats Digital up for 5 Titles at UK’s National Technology Awards

Coats Digital's GSDCost earns recognition and five nominations...
×